"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything." - Friedrick Nietzsche

Atheist, scientist, secular Buddhist, rat lover, etc.

Originally from Iowa,I am a biology graduate student at Memorial University of Newfoundland.

I think one reason metta isn’t a more prominent practice among American Buddhists is that it can feel so tremendously strange and artificial the first few times you try it. We become painfully aware that we’re just playing a kind of game in our heads – the person we “send metta” to is unaware and unaffected. To people of a secular frame of mind, it can even evoke the dreaded sense of praying. To whom, they wonder, are we praying for these benefits? … we “send metta” – not to transmit a mysterious power, but to engage the social attunement circuits of our brain by imagining our relationships with others. The benefit of our practice for others lies in our enhanced ability to respond to those around us with kindness, patience and compassion, thereby helping to decrease the world’s supply of negative reactivity. By

Marc Knickelbine


  1. glawarhal reblogged this from casualstroll
  2. dennydriver reblogged this from casualstroll
  3. mynameiskleio reblogged this from thelittleartiste
  4. thelittleartiste reblogged this from casualstroll
  5. kloudsixty9 reblogged this from casualstroll
  6. mangopatch reblogged this from zenhumanism
  7. god-is-in-you reblogged this from agri-om
  8. agri-om reblogged this from zenhumanism
  9. zenhumanism reblogged this from casualstroll
  10. casualstroll posted this